Catalogue entry
Lorenzo Veneziano documented 1353–79
NG 3897
The Madonna of Humility with Saints Mark and John the Baptist
2011
,Extracted from:
Dillian Gordon, The Italian Paintings Before 1400 (London: National Gallery Company and Yale University Press, 2011).

© The National Gallery, London

Detail of Saint John the Baptist in NG 3897. © The National Gallery, London
c. 1366–70
Egg tempera on wood, 31.3 × 57.5 cm.
The Virgin wears a blue cloak with a green lining embroidered with a gold floral pattern. She has a gold star on each shoulder and another on her head; a roundel at her neckline which is now barely visible may have shown a sunburst. Her pink dress is also patterned with gold. She wears a ring with a jewel on her right hand. She is suckling the Child, who wears an elaborate apricot‐coloured wrap, also with gold embroidery, over white swaddling clothes with gold stripes. Stippled into the gold background above her are twelve stars, and a crescent moon is at her feet. Below, on either side of her, is the inscription SC̄A/ MARIA D’LAUMI/LITADE (Holy Mary of Humility).1 On the Virgin’s proper right is Saint Mark, carrying his Gospel and identified by the inscription ·S·/ MAR/CHUS (the M has been slightly altered by restoration); he wears a red robe and a pink cloak with a green lining. On her proper left is Saint John the Baptist, identified by the inscription ·S·/ ·IOHĒS·/ · B͞TI·; he wears a green cloak over a camel‐skin garment and is carrying a scroll inscribed ECCE/A(G?)N’/ DEI/ ECCE/ QUI/ TOLIS/ PECA/TA/ MVN/DI/ MIS/ERE/RE (‘Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Have mercy [upon us]’).2
Technical Notes
Panel structure and condition
Total size (excluding the outermost moulding of the frame all round, which is not original) 31.3 × 57.5 cm. Painted surface: central compartment, with rounded arch, c. 23.0 × 18.4 cm; side compartments, with pointed arches, each c. 23.0 × 12.0 cm. Each compartment has a cusped top.
The three compartments with their framework are on a single board of wood with a horizontal grain and a marked convex warp. X‐radiography (fig. 3) shows that the panel is extremely worm‐damaged.
The frame mouldings, which are typically Venetian, are original. X‐radiography reveals that within the spandrels between the arches were originally carved rosettes, which have been turned into roundels with filling and regilding.3
It was considered too risky to remove the outermost frame to inspect the edges, but there are no signs in the X‐radiograph to indicate that anything was ever attached to it, and it is likely that it was always an autonomous panel.
The back has been painted with brown, probably when the painting was in the collection of Henry Wagner (see below and NG 3375 (p. 438) et al. ). There are five labels on the back:
- 1. Henry J. Murcott, Picture Frame Manufacturer, 6 Endell Street, Long Acre, London W.C.
- 2. Two for the Art Treasures exhibition in Manchester, 1857, Rev. J. F. Russell, Green 116.
- 3. Royal Academy, London, 1878 exhibition of Old Masters as Berna (sic) da Siena, Revd. John Fuller Russell, 4 Ormonde Terrace, Regents Park.
- 4. Exhibition of Early Italian Art, London, 1893–4, Berna da Siena, lent by Henry Wagner Esq., Reg. 97–11.

Detail of the Virgin and Child. © The National Gallery, London

Composite X‐radiograph of NG 3897, including non‐original frame. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the changes around the Virgin, showing where the rays stop and the added gold. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the Virgin’s hand painted without green earth underpaint, with a mordant‐gilded ring. © The National Gallery, London
Painting condition and technique
Cleaned and restored in 1970.
The painted surface is generally in good condition. There is an area of damage at the bottom left‐hand corner in Saint Mark’s compartment. The gilding of the frame has been repaired.
The triangular indentations decorating the round and pointed arches and the outside frame moulding have traces of vermilion in them; the rest, including those in the capitals and spandrels, are painted with azurite.
A simple underdrawing outlining the folds of the drapery is visible with infrared reflectography (fig. 6). Some of the folds of the Virgin’s drapery were incised. Odd lines above the crescent moon may perhaps delineate the initial intentions for the fall of the drapery around the moon. After the composition had been sketched in, small adjustments were made to the drapery around Saint Mark’s right foot, to his hand, which was originally slightly higher up, and to Saint John, whose right foot was originally further forward and his left foot further to the right.
Unusually, changes were made to the figure of the Virgin at several stages during the production of the painting. After the figure had been drawn, the outlines were incised where they meet the gold, as was the practice in paintings with a gold background. However, after the background had already been water gilded and the rays incised around the Virgin, her entire outline, except for her head, was reduced in size so that extra gold had to be added all around, and in some places the rays extended (figs 4 and 6).
After the Virgin’s right hand had been painted, it was painted again, this time clutching the baby higher up. The [page 309][page 310] original position, with the hand more open, shows clearly in infrared reflectography (see fig. 6) because the green earth underpaint shows dark, while the new hand has no green underpaint, but a pink underlayer instead, and shows in the reflectogram in its present position thanks to black outlining (fig. 5).

Infrared reflectogram detail showing the Virgin and Child. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the punched decoration of Saint Mark’s halo. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the punched decoration of Saint John the Baptist’s halo. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the Virgin’s face. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the mordant gilding on the lining of the Virgin’s cloak. © The National Gallery, London
The water gilding of the backgrounds is in reasonably good condition. The haloes have been executed with two single dot punches: a finer one for stippling and a coarser one in clusters of three around their circumferences. The curling motif in the halo of Saint Mark (fig. 7) has been incised and then punched with the fine punch. The Virgin’s halo has been stippled with densely packed straight lines around quatrefoil and circular shapes, the latter with a central dot. The Child’s halo has been incised with a cross, left plain, the intervening spaces decorated with stippled tendrils. Saint John’s halo alternates a six‐petal rosette with leaves, both motifs created by stippling with the very fine punch to emulate the effect of composite punches (fig. 8). Twelve stars have been stippled around the Virgin and the rays which surround her have been incised freehand.
The mordant gilding, applied on a greyish‐brown mordant, is in good condition and has been used for the Virgin’s inscription; to decorate the borders of robes; as a single edging line for the draperies; for the Virgin’s ring (see fig. 5); for the gold patterns on her pink dress, the green lining of her blue cloak (fig. 10), and the Child’s apricot‐coloured wrap; for the stripes on the Child’s white swaddling clothes; and for the decoration of Saint Mark’s book and the gold embroidery on the front of his robe. The moon at the Virgin’s feet and the three stars on her cloak – one at her forehead and one on each shoulder – have also been mordant gilded. The mordant‐gilded roundel on her neckline is damaged, but judging from other versions (see below) almost certainly showed a gold sunburst.
The flesh has a green underpaint and is often outlined with brown or black (figs 9 and 12).
The rich blue of the Virgin’s cloak has been painted with ultramarine over a lighter blue layer. Her dress was originally darker, but the red lake has faded. The distinctive green widely used throughout the painting has been created by mixing high‐quality azurite with yellow, probably an opaque yellow pigment, and white, and possibly a yellow lake.
[page 311]The Child’s cloak has been painted with lead‐tin yellow highlights over an apricot‐coloured base which probably contains earth pigments.
Saint Mark’s red robe has been painted using vermilion, with red lake shadows and yellowish highlights; his pink cloak, lined with green, has been painted with red lake mixed with white, with black and blue added for the shadows. His book is yellow, with a diamond‐shaped decoration in blue, and black straps.
John the Baptist’s green cloak (see p. 305, fig. 1) has red lake shadows and yellow highlights; its lining has been painted with ultramarine mixed with white.
The vermilion used for the inscriptions identifying the saints is well preserved.
Attribution and Date
Although acquired as by Tomaso da Modena,4 NG 3897 is generally accepted as being by Lorenzo Veneziano, to whom it was first attributed by Evelyn Sandberg‐Vavalà in 1930.5 Pietro Toesca and Bernard Berenson agreed with the attribution, as did Martin Davies and Rodolfo Pallucchini.6 Luigi Coletti called it Giovanni da Bologna.7 Hans Gronau (oral communication, 1936) put it between Paolo Veneziano and Lorenzo Veneziano. Ferdinando Bologna ascribed it to the painter he names the Master of Arquà.8 Lionello Puppi attributed it to Jacobello del Bonomo (for whom see p. 272).9
Sandberg‐Vavalà dated NG 3897 between Lorenzo’s polyptych with the Annunciation signed and dated 1371 (Venice, Accademia) and the Virgin and Child formerly in San Francesco, Rieti (Paris, Louvre), signed and dated 1372.10 Cristina Guarnieri, probably correctly, places it slightly earlier, between the Proti polyptych of 1366 (Vicenza, Duomo) and the polyptych showing the Traditio Clavium (Venice, Museo Correr) dated 1370 (1369 Venetian style).11
Iconography and Function
The iconography combines the Virgin of Humility, as identified in the inscription, with the celestial Woman described in the Apocalypse (Revelation 12:1) as ‘a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars’; it belongs with a type that was extremely popular in northern Italy, including Venice, from around 1355, as discussed by Millard Meiss.12 When the Virgin’s hand was in its original position, the iconography would have been closer to a main prototype for the Madonna of Humility that is reflected in several versions of the subject; NG 3897 may possibly be related to the version that Meiss suggested was invented by Simone Martini.13 It is noteworthy, however, that apart from the Madonna of Humility in San Domenico Maggiore, Naples, generally attributed to the circle of, or a follower of, Simone Martini,14 the overwhelming majority of Sienese versions show the Child on the right, generally suckling the Virgin’s left breast, while north Italian painters show the Child on the left.15 In north Italian versions the Virgin of Humility is often shown seated on a rounded mound of earth, sometimes covered with flowers, which Margreet Mudde relates to the Latin for earth (humus).16
A marked feature which persists in many versions is that the Child’s feet are crossed one over the other, and the sole of his foot (fig. 12), which will be pierced with a nail at the Crucifixion, is exposed.17
The Madonna of Humility suckling the Child (fig. 11), sometimes with the sun as a brooch at her throat, was extremely common in the oeuvre of Lorenzo Veneziano and his workshop (see, for example, fig. 13).18
Although sometimes referred to as a predella, for instance by Pallucchini and Bologna and by Mauro Lucco,19 it is more likely that NG 3897 is complete in itself (see above) and was an autonomous devotional panel.20 A similar panel of the Madonna of Humility in the Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht (fig. 14), with the Virgin suckling the Child and the moon at her feet, flanked by Saint Blaise and Saint Helen(?) introducing a male donor and a female lay donor respectively, attributed to the workshop of Lorenzo Veneziano and similarly judged to be an autonomous work,21 shows the likely type of patronal context of small devotional panels into which NG 3897 fits.22[page 312] The presence of Saint Mark, patron saint of Venice, suggests that NG 3897 was painted for a Venetian patron, possibly someone whose name saint was John the Baptist. The Baptist’s text would have reminded the worshipper of the liturgy of the Mass, and emphasised his role: the Baptist often appears together with the Virgin as intercessor for mankind, particularly in scenes of the Last Judgement.23

Photomicrograph of the Child suckling. © The National Gallery, London

Photomicrograph of the Child’s feet. © The National Gallery, London

Lorenzo Veneziano, The Madonna of Humility and The Crucifixion, c. 1350. Tempera on wood, 110 × 45.5 cm. London, Samuel Courtauld Trust, Courtauld Institute of Art Gallery (inv. 307). LONDON © Samuel Courtauld Trust, The Courtauld Gallery, London/The Bridgeman Art Library
Exhibited
Manchester 1857, Art Treasures, lent by Revd J. F. Russell (label on back but not listed in either the provisional or the definitive catalogue). London 1878, Royal Academy, Exhibition of Old Masters, lent by Revd John Fuller Russell (200, as Berna da Siena; catalogue p. 38). London 1893–4, New Gallery, Exhibition of Early Italian Art from 1300 to 1550, lent by Henry Wagner (25, as Berna da Siena; catalogue p. 5).
Provenance
In the collection of the Revd J. Fuller Russell, where probably seen by Waagen;24 sold at the Russell sale, Christie, Manson and Woods, 18 April 1885, lot 99, bought by Wagner. Presented by Henry Wagner, 1924.
[page 313]Notes
1. Williamson incorrectly records the inscription as MATER HUM (Williamson 2009, p. 168). (Back to text.)
2. From the Agnus Dei, part of the liturgy of the Mass. (Back to text.)
3. A similar carved frame with similar rosettes in the spandrels is to be found on the small panel (see fig. 13) containing the Madonna of Humility with the Crucifixion (London, Courtauld Institute of Art Gallery) by Lorenzo Veneziano, seemingly carpentered in the same workshop (illustrated in Guarnieri 2006, p. 48, fig. 6 and cat. 6, pp. 178–9; see also p. 47 for a discussion of the relationship of the carpentry to a triptych in a private collection attributed to Guariento – illustrated p. 48, fig. 7). For the carpentry of works by Lorenzo Veneziano see Guarnieri 2006, pp. 73–96, esp. p. 91. (Back to text.)
4. See the National Gallery Catalogue, London 1925, p. 334. (Back to text.)
5. Sandberg‐Vavalà 1930, pp. 54–63, esp. p. 57. (Back to text.)
6. Toesca 1951, p. 711, note 236; Berenson 1957, I, p. 99; Davies catalogued it as ‘ascribed to’ ‘indicating a measure of doubt’. See Davies 1951, pp. 244–5; 1961, p. 316; Pallucchini 1964, p. 173. (Back to text.)
7. Coletti 1931, pp. 131–43, esp. p. 135. (Back to text.)
8. Bologna 1951, pp. 21–31, esp. pp. 24ff.; Bologna 1952, p. 7. (Back to text.)
9. Puppi 1962, pp. 19–31. (Back to text.)
10. See Sandberg‐Vavalà 1930, p. 63. (Back to text.)
11. Guarnieri 2006, cat. 37, p. 207. (Back to text.)
12. Meiss 1936, pp. 435–64, esp. p. 441. See further Michael 1996, pp. 8–14; also Williamson 2009, esp. pp. 39–48, and 67ff. (Back to text.)
13. Meiss 1936, p. 436. See further van Os 1969, esp. pp. 101–42. (Back to text.)
14. For this painting see Williamson 2009, pp. 77–83. (Back to text.)
15. For example, van Os 1969, Abb. 46, 50, 53, 57, 64–71, 75. (Back to text.)
16. See Margreet Mudde in van Os, van Asperen de Boer and de Jong‐Janssen 1978, no. 24, pp. 103–5. (Back to text.)
17. Such as Pallucchini 1964, figs 464, 465, 593, 596, for the pose of the Virgin and Child close to NG 3897. (Back to text.)
18. See Guarnieri 2006, cat. 6, pp. 178–9 (panel, London, Courtauld Institute); cat. 11, pp. 183–5 (canvas, Verona, Sant’Anastasia); cat. 12, p. 185 (canvas, heavily repainted, Vicenza, Santa Corona); cat. 21, pp. 192–3 (canvas, Trieste, Santa Maria Maggiore). (Back to text.)
19. Mauro Lucco in Lucco 1992, p. 289. (Back to text.)
20. See Davies rev. Gordon 1988, p. 66; also De Marchi 1995, pp. 241–56, esp. p. 252, note 46. (Back to text.)
21. De Jong‐Janssen and van Wegen 1995, pp. 68–9. (Back to text.)
22. Guarnieri 2006, p. 100, suggests that the Dominican Order had a particular predilection for the Virgin of Humility. For Lorenzo’s known patrons see Guarnieri 2006, pp. 97–109. (Back to text.)
23. Michael 1996, p. 11, states that the Virgin often intercedes for mankind through lactation before Christ in Judgement. For the significance of the Virgin lactans see Williamson 2009, pp. 48–53 and 132–47. (Back to text.)
24. Waagen 1854, II, p. 462, as Berna or Barna da Siena. The description does not fit well but this is probably the picture. He describes ‘this little picture’ as ‘Three Gothic pediments which formed the top of an altar’ showing the Virgin and Child with Saints Paul and John the Baptist. Waagen may have been responsible for the attribution to Barna under which it was exhibited in 1893–4. (Back to text.)

Workshop of Lorenzo Veneziano, The Madonna of Humility with Saints Blaise and Helen(?) and two donors, c.1365. Tempera on wood, 26 × 46.5 cm. Maastricht, Bonnefantenmuseum, on loan from the National Institute of Cultural Heritage, Rijswijk. MAASTRICHT © Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht/photo Peter Cox
List of references cited
- Berenson 1957
- Berenson, Bernard, Italian Pictures of the Renaissance: The Venetian School (Gordon 2011 refers to vol. 1 only), 2 vols, London 1957
- Bologna 1951
- Bologna, Ferdinando, ‘Contributi allo studio della pittura veneziana del Trecento’, Arte Veneta, 1951, 5, 21–31
- Bologna 1952
- Bologna, Ferdinando, ‘Contributi allo studio della pittura veneziana del Trecento (II)’, Arte Veneta, 1952, 6, 7–18
- Coletti 1931
- Coletti, Luigi, ‘Sul polittico di Chioggia e su Giovanni da Bologna’, L’Arte, 1931, 34, 131–43
- Davies 1951
- Davies, Martin, National Gallery Catalogues: The Earlier Italian Schools, London 1951
- Davies rev. Gordon 1988
- Davies, Martin, revised by D. Gordon, National Gallery Catalogues: The Early Italian Schools Before 1400, revised edn of Davies 1961, London 1988
- De Jong‐Janssen and van Wegen 1995
- Jong‐Janssen, CE. de, with contributions from D.H. van Wegen, Catalogue of the Italian Paintings in the Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht 1995
- De Marchi 1995
- De Marchi, Andrea, ‘Una tavola nella Narodna Galerie di Llubljana e una proposta per Marco di Paolo Veneziano’, in Gotika v Sloveniji, ed. J. Höfler (Atti del convegno di studi, Ljubljana, 20–22 October 1994), Ljubljana 1995, 241–56
- Guarnieri 2006
- Guarnieri, Cristina, Lorenzo Veneziano, Milan 2006
- Lucco 1992
- Lucco, Mauro, ed., La pittura nel Veneto. Il Trecento, Milan 1992, vols 1 and 2
- Meiss 1936
- Meiss, Millard, ‘The Madonna of Humility’, Art Bulletin, 1936, 18, 4, 435–64
- Michael 1996
- Michael, Michael, ‘The Virgin and Child before a Firescreen at the National Gallery. The origins of the Madonna of Humility as the Amicta Sole’, Apollo, 1996, 143, 411, 8–14
- Mudde 1978
- Mudde, Margreet, in The Early Venetian Paintings in Holland, trans. by Michael Hoyle, eds Henk W. van Os, Johan R. van Asperen de Boer, C.E. de Jong‐Janssen and Charlotte Wiethoff, Maarssen 1978, 24, 103–5
- National Gallery 1925
- National Gallery, National Gallery Catalogue, London 1925
- Padfield et al. 2002
- Padfield, J., D. Saunders, J. Cupitt and R. Atkinson, ‘Improvements in the Acquisition and Processing of X‐ray Images of Paintings’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 2002, 23, 62–75
- Pallucchini 1964
- Pallucchini, Rodolfo, La Pittura Veneziana del Trecento, Venice and Rome 1964
- Puppi 1962
- Puppi, Lionello, ‘Contributi a Jacobello di Bonomo’, Arte Veneta, 1962, 16, 19–31
- Sandberg‐Vavalà 1930
- Sandberg‐Vavalà, Evelyn, ‘A triptych of Lorenzo Veneziano’, Art in America, 1930, 18, 2, 54–63
- Saunders et al. 2006
- Saunders, David, Rachel Billinge, John Cupitt, Nick Atkinson and Haida Liang, ‘A New Camera for High‐Resolution Infrared Imaging of Works of Art’, Studies in Conservation, 2006, 51, 277–90
- Skaug 1994
- Skaug, Erling, Punch Marks from Giotto to Fra Angelico, Oslo 1994, 1 and 2
- Toesca 1951
- Toesca, Pietro, Storia dell’Arte Italiana. Il Trecento, Turin 1951
- Van Os 1969
- van Os, Henk W., Marias Demut und Verherrlichung in der sienesischen Malerei 1300–1450, The Hague 1969
- Van Os, van Asperen de Boer and de Jong‐Janssen 1978
- van Os, Henk W., Johan R. van Asperen de Boer, C.E. de Jong‐Janssen and Charlotte Wiethoff, eds, The Early Venetian Paintings in Holland, trans. by Michael Hoyle, Maarssen 1978
- Waagen 1854–7
- Waagen, Gustav Friedrich, Treasures of Art in Great Britain: Being an Account of the Chief Collections of Paintings, Drawings, Sculptures, Illuminated Mss., &c. &c., ed. and trans. Lady E. Eastlake, 3 vols, London 1854 (Galleries and Cabinets of Art in Great Britain, London 1857, supplement (vol. 4))
- Williamson 2009
- Williamson, Beth, The Madonna of Humility: Development, Dissemination and Reception, c.1340–1400, Woodbridge 2009
List of exhibitions cited
- London 1878
- London, Royal Academy, Exhibition of Old Masters, 1878
- London 1893–4
- London, New Gallery, Exhibition of Early Italian Art from 1300 to 1550, 1893–4
- London 1989–90
- London, National Gallery, Art in the Making. Italian Painting before 1400, 29 November 1989–28 February 1990
The Organisation and Method of the Catalogue
Sequence
The artists are listed in alphabetical order. Paintings are catalogued in chronological order under the artist’s name. Some artists are identified only as the master of a particular work, such as the Master of the Borgo Crucifix; others are known only through their association with a particular area, such as Pisa, Venice or Umbria.
Attribution
A painting is discussed under the artist’s name where the authorship is not considered to be in doubt. ‘Attributed to’ implies a certain measure of doubt.
Dimensions
Dimensions are given in centimetres; height is preceded by width.
Technical information and method
The paintings listed here, except Segna di Buonaventura’s Crucifix (NG 567), Spinello Aretino’s fresco (NG 1216.1) and Jacopo di Cione’s Crucifixion (NG 1468), have been re‐examined for this catalogue in the conservation studios. The paintings have been remeasured and examined with X‐radiography and infrared reflectography wherever possible.
The X‐radiographs were made using conventional X‐ray sensitive film sheets (30 × 40 cm, Kodak Industrex AA400), which have been scanned to produce 16‐bit mono TIFF digital images and finally assembled using software to produce a mosaic.1 A complete survey of the paintings in infrared was made using a Hamamatsu C2400 vidicon system, equipped with a N2606‐06 vidicon tube, which is sensitive between 500 and 2200 nm (radiation shorter than 900 nm was excluded using a Kodak 87A filter). Where features of interest were identified these were then recorded subsequently, when it became available, with SIRIS or OSIRIS, the Gallery’s digital infrared imaging systems, equipped with InGaAs detectors sensitive between 900 and 1700 nm.2 The paintings were examined with a Wild M650 stereo‐binocular operating microscope at magnifications between 6× and 40×. Photomicrographs were taken using a Zeiss Axiocam HrC mounted on the Wild microscope.
Occasionally references are made to X‐radiographs and infrared images which are not illustrated; this is because once these images are reduced to page size the information they contain is often no longer decipherable.
Technique and condition are discussed together since the condition of a painting is often, among other factors, the result of the techniques employed in its making.
Support
Descriptions of construction and carpentry are based on direct physical examination, infrared images and X‐radiographs. The support is assumed to be poplar unless otherwise stated. Where the wood has been identified positively, this is noted.
Medium
The medium of the paint is assumed to be egg tempera unless otherwise stated. For some of the works, analysis of the binding medium in paint samples has been carried out using Fourier transform infrared microscopy (FTIR) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), usually during earlier examinations or in conjunction with conservation treatment. The results are described in the individual catalogue entries and, where published, the reference is given. Some further analysis of samples from a few of the paintings has been carried out specifically for this catalogue.
Gilding and tooling
Information on gilding is presented before that on painting, in keeping with the order of execution. Mordant gilding and silvering are included in the discussion on gilding, despite being applied in the later stages, so that all the techniques of metal leaf decoration could be discussed together. The individual punches are described, but the reader is also referred to Erling Skaug’s catalogue published in 1994. The particular gilding technique used by the artists has generally been identified from examination of the surface of the painting with a stereomicroscope. In some cases samples were available from previous examinations and were re‐examined, or occasionally a new sample was taken, particularly where analysis of the metal leaf or investigation of the composition of a mordant was of interest. Where metal leaf has been identified, this has been confirmed with energy dispersive X‐ray analysis in the scanning electron microscope (SEM‐EDX).
Punch mark illustrations
Unfortunately, when printed, some photomicrographs that show depressions in a paint surface appear to the reader reversed. This is particularly disturbing with some images of punch marks in gilding which may seem to show raised pastiglia. This phenomenon is a result of the way the human brain interprets visual signals; expecting a pattern of shadows and highlights to have been caused by raised areas (which would be more usual in normal life), this is the message sent to the reader by the brain.
[page xxiii]Pigments
Descriptions of the pigments for many of the paintings were available from earlier research carried out during the preparation for the 1989 exhibition Art in the Making: Italian Painting before 1400. Information also existed from studies of new acquisitions or from analysis carried out in support of conservation treatment. The paint samples that existed from earlier examinations were re‐examined with optical microscopy, SEM‐EDX and occasionally Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy. A limited number of new samples were taken to address specific questions that arose during the research for the catalogue. The surface of the paintings was examined under a stereomicroscope wherever possible at magnifications of up to 40×. At this magnification many pigments can be identified with a reasonable degree of reliability, and these examinations greatly extended the information on pigments and pigment mixtures in areas of the paintings that were not sampled, and enabled the observations from samples to be correlated with the appearance of the painting itself.
Comments
As full an account as possible is given with regard to authorship, companion panels – particularly relevant for altar pieces – subject matter, iconography, original location, date, patronage and so on. The compiler has tried to make this information accessible to the lay reader as well as to the art historian. Inevitably there is a certain amount of speculation, but it is made clear where an argument is hypothetical. For ease of reference the comments are given subheadings, but their sequence varies according to the requirements of the argument.
Notes and references
1. X‐radiography and the associated scanning of the plates and processing were carried
out by the photographic departments of the National Gallery. For a full description
of the process see J. Padfield, D. Saunders, J. Cupitt and R. Atkinson, ‘Improvements in the
Acquisition and Processing
acquisition and processing
of X‐ray images of paintings’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 23, 2002, pp. 62–75. (Back to text.)
2. For more details on SIRIS see D. Saunders, R. Billinge, J. Cupitt, N. Atkinson and H. Liang, ‘A new camera for high‐resolution infrared imaging of works of art’, Studies in Conservation, 51, 2006, pp. 277–90. (Back to text.)
About this version
Version 3, generated from files DG_2011__16.xml dated 06/03/2025 and database__16.xml dated 09/03/2025 using stylesheet 16_teiToHtml_externalDb.xsl dated 03/01/2025. Entries for NG564, NG566, NG579.6-NG579.8, NG752, NG1139-NG1140 & NG1330, NG1147, NG1468, NG2927, NG3897, NG5360, NG6572-NG6573 and NG6599 marked for publication; citations for NG6583 altered to include update date.
Cite this entry
- Permalink (this version)
- https://data.ng.ac.uk/0E9D-000B-0000-0000
- Permalink (latest version)
- https://data.ng.ac.uk/0E6Q-000B-0000-0000
- Chicago style
- Gordon, Dillian. “NG 3897, The Madonna of Humility with Saints Mark and John the Baptist”. 2011, online version 3, March 9, 2025. https://data.ng.ac.uk/0E9D-000B-0000-0000.
- Harvard style
- Gordon, Dillian (2011) NG 3897, The Madonna of Humility with Saints Mark and John the Baptist. Online version 3, London: National Gallery, 2025. Available at: https://data.ng.ac.uk/0E9D-000B-0000-0000 (Accessed: 29 March 2025).
- MHRA style
- Gordon, Dillian, NG 3897, The Madonna of Humility with Saints Mark and John the Baptist (National Gallery, 2011; online version 3, 2025) <https://data.ng.ac.uk/0E9D-000B-0000-0000> [accessed: 29 March 2025]