Catalogue entry
François Millet 1851–1917
NG 6253
The Church at Arbonne
2019
,Extracted from:
Sarah Herring, The Nineteenth Century French Paintings (London: National Gallery Company and Yale University Press, 2019).

© The National Gallery, London
1870–80
Oil on canvas, 36.8 × 44.7 cm
Signed lower right corner: F. Millet, and underneath a word, now illegible (a date, or more likely ‘fils’?)
Support
The canvas is lined, and the stretcher is possibly original. There are pinholes in each of the four corners. On the back are fragments of paper with the following inscription: ‘des environs de/Fontainebleau par / …llet f[ils]…’. There is also a fragment of newspaper on the back, with the following text: ‘… even the Millet gallery, about whi… out Paris lately raved for weeks, wa…. worth seeing from an art point of … Millet unquestionably drew and …ed like no one else, but his labours … confined within a comparatively short…’.
Materials and Technique
The X‐radiograph (fig. 1) reveals another picture underneath the final composition, possibly an upright landscape, and presumably by the same hand. If the present picture is turned anticlockwise to a vertical position there appears to be a horizon line running roughly centrally, just to the left of the church, above which is a broadly painted sky. In the middle, just above the present church tower, a large rounded dark shape may be read as a tree. To the left, a further possible small tree and a long rectangular shape, possibly a building, lie on the horizon. In the infrared reflectogram an unexplained loose diamond shape is visible in the foreground, just left of centre.

X‐ray photograph of NG 6253. © The National Gallery, London

A preliminary drawing from a portfolio of drawings by François Millet, 1870–80. Pen and ink with charcoal(?) on paper. Private collection. © Christie’s Images

François Millet, Church at Arbonne, 1870s(?). Oil on canvas, 77.4 × 97.7 cm. Private collection. © Courtesy of the owners
The painting has a complex paint layer structure which is consistent with the reworking described above.1 For example, a sample from the present sky in the top right‐hand corner has revealed that above the preparation layers is a pale blue paint layer (the sky of the underlying painting) containing lead white and cerulean blue,2 followed by two opaque layers of paint, the first bright yellow (mainly yellow earth) and the second a bright red (a mixture of vermilion, red earth and red lake). These bright opaque layers have been interpreted as colours to block out the first composition in preparation for the subsequent layers. The sky that we see on the picture surface consists of wet‐in‐wet layers of grey and blue paint, which are composed of mixtures of lead white, cobalt blue, black and a little cadmium yellow and yellow earth. The sky of the two compositions is painted using different blue pigments, the final composition making use of the more common cobalt blue and the earlier composition using cerulean blue. While the latter pigment has been found on a number of paintings by Corot in the collection, it was in general much less frequently used by artists associated with the Barbizon school.
A sample from the foreground meadow on the right‐hand edge is made up of three layers of green; a middle layer of khaki green is sandwiched between two layers of light green. All three layers contain coarse particles of viridian. The layers below the green paint relate to the previous composition: a bright yellow (mainly yellow earth), a thin yellow‐green (opaque yellow and viridian) and then in the lowest layer, the same pale blue of the previous sky (lead white and cerulean blue). Surface examination has revealed, at the top left corner, a reddish‐brown paint visible under the present sky. A further, paler, reddish brown is visible under the cloud, top right centre.
Medium analysis identified heat‐bodied poppy oil as the paint binder in samples taken from the brown‐green foliage, the green grass and the white cloud.
The brushwork is fairly loose throughout. In the church tower a mottled effect is created by the overlaying of wavy strokes in cream over a light grey. A very light cream paint is also used to highlight such features as the line of a roof, helping to convey the sense of direct sunlight. The trees are painted in numerous small touches of greens and browns, whereas the broader expanses of grass and sky are painted quite smoothly, with horizontal strokes. The sky is brought round the church buildings and the trees. The church tower and weather vane were originally painted slightly to the left and their original positions are visible to the naked eye.
Conservation and Condition
NG 6253 was cleaned and restored in 1978–9. There is some wear that has been retouched in the sky.
Discussion
A path leads across a grassy meadow to a church. To the left a figure in a red cap pastures two cows, and several chickens or ducks are scattered on the grass. To the right of an archway a waggon stands against the wall, its wheel picked out in a bluish‐grey paint, which is also used more extensively in this area. Further to the right a graveyard is visible over a low wall.
NG 6253 has been identified by Alexandra Murphy as a painting by Millet’s son, François Millet (1851–1917).3 A pupil of his father, he emulated the elder Millet’s subject matter, specialising in genre, landscape, still life and portraits. Paintings by his hand usually bear a standard signature: ‘F. Millet fils’, which is what the signature here most probably reads. In addition, the fragments of inscription on the back imply that the picture is by the son rather than the father.4
Alexandra Murphy has also identified the church as the Norman church at Arbonne (now Arbonne‐la‐forêt), a village to the south‐west of Barbizon. A preliminary drawing forms part of a portfolio of drawings by François Millet (fig. 2), and a related painting signed ‘F. Millet, fils’, entitled Church at Arbonne, depicts the same scene (fig. 3).5 The image can be related to Jean‐François Millet’s Church at Gréville (1871–4; fig. 4), of which François Millet painted a copy (also dated between 1871 and 1874; fig. 5), perhaps at the same period, as a response to the father’s work.6
Provenance
In the collection of Clara Sophia Jessup Bloomfield Moore (1824–1899); her sale, Christie’s, 5 May 1900, lot 25, bought Cliff for £31;7 with the Fine Art Society, London, [page 403] January 1938 from whom bought by Sir Victor Alexander Augustus Henry Wellesley (1876–1954) in the same year;8 bequeathed by Wellesley to the Gallery in 1954.9

Jean‐François Millet, Church at Gréville, between 1871–4. Oil on canvas, 60 × 74 cm. Paris, Musée d’Orsay. © RMN‐Grand Palais (musée d’Orsay) / Stéphane Maréchalle

François Millet, copy of Jean‐François Millet’s Church at Gréville, between 1871–4. Oil on canvas, 59.5 × 73 cm. Private collection. © Courtesy of the owners
Former Owners: Bloomfield Moore and Wellesley
Clara Sophia Jessup Bloomfield Moore was a novelist and writer on etiquette from Philadelphia.10 At his death in 1878 her husband left her a fortune amassed in a paper‐manufacturing firm that he had formed with her father. She subsequently spent a period of time travelling in Europe, and many of her later years in London. According to her obituary in the New York Times (6 January 1899) she became friendly with Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881) while living in London, who advised her to collect living artists’ work, and it is likely that she bought this painting in London. Sir Victor Wellesley KCMG, CB, had a career in the Foreign Office and was made Deputy Under‐Secretary of State in the Foreign Office in 1925. He was also an amateur painter of landscapes and portraits who frequently exhibited at the Royal Academy.
Exhibitions
On long‐term loan to the Arts Council of Great Britain, Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool, from 5 May 1958 to 8 March 1963 .
Literature
Davies and Gould 1970, p. 103; Kirby, Spring and Higgitt 2007, p. 91.
Notes
1 A lower layer of light brown, which varies in tone throughout the picture, is possibly a ground layer. However, this may be an underlayer as one paint sample revealed a tiny fragment of white paint, which may be a more traditional white ground. (Back to text.)
2 Cerulean blue has been identified on three other paintings in the present volume, all by Corot (NG 2625, NG 2629 and NG 6340) all believed to have been painted between 1860 and 1874. (Back to text.)
3 The attribution to Millet fils, the identification of the church and the reference to the drawing are all in a letter from Alexandra Murphy dated 27 March 2011. Robert L. Herbert had previously written on 2 October 1972, identifying the church as Norman and concluding that the son finished a picture that Millet himself had begun. (Back to text.)
4 Some paintings by François Millet are signed as by Millet and son, for example La Becquée (watercolour and gouache), which is inscribed on the back: ‘Peint par mon père et moi, Juillet 1873’, and signed by François Millet. With Deburaux, 2 December 2007, lot 144 who note that Jean‐François Millet contributed to the drawing and figures. (Back to text.)
5 Sold at the American Art Association, Anderson Galleries, New York, 23 March 1933, lot 68. A photograph in the Witt Library, L’Eglise du Village (77 × 98 cm), with a pond or stream in the foreground, is probably identical to the former painting. The author is again indebted to Alexandra Murphy for pointing this out. (Back to text.)
6 Suggestion of Alexandra Murphy. The copy (private collection) was with Deburaux, Paris, 17 May 2009, lot 86. (Back to text.)
7 As Millet (father and son), A Village Scene, with Church in the neighbourhood of Fontainebleau. Cliff bought a number of works at this sale and in other sales that year, including works by David Cox, Walter Crane, Alma‐Tadema, La Thangue, Fildes and Diaz. There is no information regarding the buyer in Christie’s Archives (communication of 24 July 2014 from Martina Fusari) and he is yet to be identified. (Back to text.)
8 Fine Art Society label on frame: ‘The Church at Fontainebleau January 1938’. The Fine Art Society’s stock and sales books prior to 1945 have been destroyed but they have been able to convey the information that Victor Wellesley bought a painting ascribed to Millet from them at some point in 1938. (Back to text.)
9 As Millet, ‘The Church at Fontainebleau’. A notice in The Times, 15 July 1954, announces his will. He left ‘the choice of the contents of a vitrine (these are objects, mostly pottery, of Inca, Egyptian, Phoenician, Persian, Greek and Chinese origin)’ and other effects to the Victoria and Albert Museum, and paintings and watercolours to the National Gallery, Tate Gallery, Leighton House Museum and the Russell Cotes Museum and Art Gallery, Bournemouth. See entry by E. Goldstein on Wellesley in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford 2004, LVIII, pp. 46–7), who states that he was a gifted amateur painter who frequently exhibited at the Royal Academy and elsewhere. (Back to text.)
10 See James 1971, II, pp. 573–4, and Marchino entry in Garratty and Carnes 1999, XV, pp. 741–2. (Back to text.)
List of references cited
- Davies and Gould 1970
- Davies, Martin, revised by Cecil Gould, National Gallery Catalogues: French School Early 19th Century, Impressionists, Post‐Impressionists, etc., London 1970
- Egerton 1998
- Egerton, Judy, National Gallery Catalogues: The British School, London 1998
- Garratty and Carnes 1999
- Garratty, John A. and Mark C. Carnes, eds, American National Biography, 24 vols, New York and Oxford 1999
- Goldstein 2004
- Goldstein, E., in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford 2004, LVIII, 46–7
- James 1971
- James, Edward T., ed., Notable American Women 1607–1950: A Biographical Dictionary, 4 vols, Cambridge 1971
- Kirby, Spring and Higgitt 2007
- Kirby, Jo, Marika Spring and Catherine Higgitt, ‘The Technology of Eighteenth‐ and Nineteenth‐Century Red Lake Pigments’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 2007, 28, 69–95
- New York Times 1899
- New York Times, 6 January 1899
- Times 1954
- The Times, 15 July 1954
List of exhibitions cited
- Liverpool 1958–1963
- Liverpool, Walker Art Gallery, long-term loan, 5 May 1958–8 March 1963; organised through the Arts Council of Great Britain
The Scope and Presentation of the Catalogue
The paintings catalogued in this volume are, for the most part, landscapes dating from the early nineteenth century through to the early 1870s, by mainly French artists working before and overlapping slightly with their successors, the Impressionists.
Swiss, Flemish and Belgian landscapists in the collection have been included. Denis and Cels (the latter painting later in the century) both worked in the oil sketching tradition which, while centred in Italy at the beginning of the century, was international in scope. The Swiss landscape artist Calame also practised oil sketching and his studio works were very much informed by French academic landscape practice. Finally, we thought it appropriate to include the British artist Bonington, who spent much of his short life in France, and was a pivotal figure between the French and British traditions. At the time Judy Egerton published her magisterial catalogue of the British School in 1998, there was no painting by Bonington in the collection to provoke discussion of the cross‐Channel artistic ferment his art initiated. Happily, that lacuna has been filled.
The bulk of the catalogue is made up of artists associated with the Barbizon School,
among them Corot – of whom the Gallery holds a substantial collection, from his earliest
to his latest work – Daubigny and Rousseau. Despite
his
being a friend and associate of Corot and Daubigny, the one work in the collection
by Honoré‐Victorin Daumier has been excluded, as he was not a landscape artist. On
the other hand, it did
not not
not
make sense to split up works by such artists as Corot, Millet and Courbet, and examples
of their figurative paintings have been included.
While these artists were regular exhibitors at the Salon, only one painting in the
collection, Millet’s The Winnower, was actually shown at a Salon, that of 1848. For the most part the paintings are
small in scale, some probably painted with private collectors or the market in mind,
others intimate recordings of landscapes, started, and in some
cases, completed
cases completed,
in the open air. As the essay on the history of the collection discusses, the National
Gallery, in common with other British institutions around 1900, was hesitant in its
collecting of such work, and the first acquisitions came as gifts or bequests from
private collections. In fact, the vast majority of the works in this catalogue came
to the Gallery as bequests or gifts, meaning that it has been dependent for such works
on the generosity of private collectors. Such a lack of proactive purchasing has inevitably
resulted in lacunae, notably in works by the Barbizon painters Constant Troyon (1810–1865)
and Charles‐Emile Jacque (1813–1894). In recent years oil studies have been purchased.
These holdings have been increased significantly by eight studies generously given
by John Lishawa in 2019, a gift alas too late to be included in this volume. Neither
have we been able to include a newly acquired painting by Bonington, On the Seine – Morning (acquired through HM Government’s Acceptance in Lieu of Inheritance Tax Scheme).
Each entry begins with technical information, the material provided by, and in its
presentation, shaped very much by the input of colleagues from the Conservation and
Scientific departments, Hayley Tomlinson, Gabriella Macaro, David Peggie and Nelly
von Aderkas. The paintings were closely examined out of their frames, both with the
naked eye and under magnification, using visible and ultraviolet light. In addition,
x‐radiographs
X‐radiographs
were made of many of the paintings and some works were also examined using infrared
reflectography. Infrared reflectography was carried out using the digital infrared
scanning camera OSIRIS which contains an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) sensor.
Paint samples obtained from the works were generally examined in cross‐section which
allowed for analysis of preparatory layers as well as the identification of pigments
and paint layer structures, providing an understanding of the artists’ working methods.
Stereo‐microscopy, scanning electron microscope with energy‐dispersive
x‐ray
X‐ray
detection (SEM–EDX), and in some cases Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR), were the main analytical instruments used in the
identification of pigments and preparatory layers. In addition, binding media analysis
was carried out on samples using gas‐chromatography (GC) or gas‐chromatography mass
spectrometry (GC–MS) while information on the dye sources used in the red or yellow
lake pigments was obtained using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).
As the nineteenth century was a period of great evolution in methods of working and materials available, particularly among landscape painters, we decided to complement the material presented in the individual entries with two essays providing more of an overview of developments in the practice and reception of landscape. These are accompanied by an essay detailing the collection of these paintings by the National Gallery itself.
The technical material is followed by discussion of the painting, with provenance and sections on exhibitions and literature. In some entries separate paragraphs are devoted to former owners, particularly in the case of less well‐known individuals and when there is speculation as to the identity of a particular collector. For that reason, such figures as Lucian Freud, who need no introduction, are not dealt with in this way.
About this version
Version 3, generated from files SH_2019__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 and database__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 using stylesheet 16_teiToHtml_externalDb.xsl dated 03/01/2025. Refactored handling of main images for each entry; entries for NG2058, NG2622, NG2632, NG2634, NG2876, NG3296, NG6253, NG6447, NG6603, NG6651-NG6654 and NG6660, and previously-published ‘taster’ entries for NG2625 and NG3237, proofread and corrected.
Cite this entry
- Permalink (this version)
- https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW2-000B-0000-0000
- Permalink (latest version)
- https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DD8-000B-0000-0000
- Chicago style
- Herring, Sarah. “NG 6253, The Church at Arbonne”. 2019, online version 3, March 2, 2025. https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW2-000B-0000-0000.
- Harvard style
- Herring, Sarah (2019) NG 6253, The Church at Arbonne. Online version 3, London: National Gallery, 2025. Available at: https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW2-000B-0000-0000 (Accessed: 31 March 2025).
- MHRA style
- Herring, Sarah, NG 6253, The Church at Arbonne (National Gallery, 2019; online version 3, 2025) <https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW2-000B-0000-0000> [accessed: 31 March 2025]