Skip to main content

Main image

The Storm:
Catalogue entry

Catalogue contents

About the catalogue

Entry details

Full title
The Storm
Artist
Narcisse-Virgilio Diaz de la Peña
Inventory number
NG2632
Author
Sarah Herring

Catalogue entry

, 2019

Extracted from:
Sarah Herring, The Nineteenth Century French Paintings (London: National Gallery Company and Yale University Press, 2019).

© The National Gallery, London

Oil on wood (probably mahogany), 61.3 × 76.6 cm

Signed bottom left: n. Diaz. 71.

Support

A broken circle is incised on the back of the panel, which is the collector’s mark of a former owner, Alexander Young.1 There is a seal in black, bottom left, the wrong way up, showing a classical wreathed head in profile (fig. 1). This seal has not been identified, but is possibly that of a former owner, Charles‐Fortunat‐Paul Casimir‐Périer (1812–1897).2 Also on the back is a stencil with the number ‘1959, XI [?] written in pencil, and ‘C6’ in chalk.

Fig. 1

The seal on the back of NG 2632, reproduced the right way up. © The National Gallery, London

Materials and Technique

The panel was first prepared with a double white ground consisting of lead white with silicate and barium sulphate extenders. On top of this white ground is a secondary translucent white ground (or priming layer) composed of zinc white with a little lead white added.

Extensive incising in the form of broad grooves in a band about one quarter of the way up and beneath the paint surface probably indicate indicates the outlines of an earlier composition. The grooves, which have tree‐like structures, suggest that the ground was incised with a tool such as a stylus in marking out the design.

Additionally, many of the samples, when viewed in cross‐section, demonstrate multi‐layered structures of varying colours. Although this is typical for Diaz, who tended to rework his paintings, some of these layers may represent an underlying composition. For example, all samples from the sky paint show green underlayers, which have no explicable relation to the sky. These green underlayers are often followed by a creamy white layer before the final dark purplish‐grey sky paint has been added. The green underlayers tend to consist of mixtures of the modern pigments emerald green, viridian and chrome yellow, among several other more traditional pigments such as earth colours and Prussian blue. The dark grey‐blue and purplish‐grey sky is created using mixtures of cobalt blue with varying proportions of lead white, ivory black, earths, and what appears to be a faded madder‐type red lake. This fading suggests the sky may have once had a more purplish hue.

Analysis of the paint media identified heat‐bodied walnut oil as the binder in paint from both the yellow impasto of the path and the olive green grass on the left edge. The grass also contained fir balsam and traces of a copal resin.3

Conservation and Condition

NG 2632 was cleaned and restored in 1977. There are white shrinkage cracks in all areas of the picture, which were touched out during restoration. Some of the dark areas are quite worn.

Discussion

Like much of his late work, this painting, from the end of the artist’s career, shows a strong feeling for natural and dramatic effects. The view is across the desolate heathlands near the village of Barbizon, with rocky outcrops in the scrub and a few sparse trees, including a prominent one on the right. A path runs through the plain, leading the eye into the composition. To the right of the path a man carrying a gun and accompanied by two dogs is painted almost entirely in monochrome, emphasising his vulnerability in the face of nature’s forces. The stormy sky breaks at the centre to show patches of blue and whiter clouds.

Diaz has adapted his brushstrokes to the drama of the scene. The landscape is painted in short, choppy, horizontal and diagonal strokes, whereas the treatment of the sky, with multi‐directional and expansive brushwork, echoes the stormy weather it describes. The brushwork of the sky where it meets the horizon, particularly in the centre of the picture, is strongly vertical, the short strokes brought down over the tops of the bushes marking the extent of the landscape, perhaps suggesting rainfall.

NG 2632 forms part of a group of paintings in which lone figures, usually hunters, are depicted at the mercy of nature. The painting is particularly closely related to Storm, Figure on a Path in the Jean‐de‐Paris (1871), which features identical trees on the right, a lone figure, and similar disposition of the clouds and path.4 A further painting, The Hunter (1871; fig. 2) , is also compositionally close, with stormy sky, path leading into the landscape and trees to the right, in this case both multiplied in number and set further to the front.5

Additional pictures, while not so close compositionally, share the atmosphere of bleak landscapes beneath stormy skies.6 In The Storm of 1872 (fig. 3), trees are arranged on the left and there is no path running through the composition. Instead the middle ground is illuminated by light streaming through the break in the clouds. The hunter is set at the edge of this lit‐up area, a lone figure viewed in silhouette [page 344] and, like the figure in NG 2632, painted in monochrome. In tone and colour the two pictures are very closely related, especially in the pervading dark greys of the sky, the lighter clouds at the centre and the dark greens of the landscape. There are also similar vertical strokes in the sky where it meets the horizon. Brettell and Eisenmann Eisenman compare NG 2632 to The Approaching Storm of 1870 (Pasadena, Norton Simon Museum).7 The treatment of the sky is similar in both, with the clouds breaking up to reveal blue sky at the centre. However, the Norton Simon picture depicts a rocky slope with a pool in the foreground. A similar twisted tree stands to the right, but it is more in the foreground and more detailed in execution, with its coppery foliage catching the light breaking through the clouds at centre.8

Fig. 2

Narcisse‐Virgilio Diaz de la Peña, The Hunter, 1871. Oil on panel, 60 × 86 cm. Private collection. © Christie’s Images / Bridgeman Images

Fig. 3

Narcisse‐Virgilio Diaz de la Peña, The Storm, 1872. Oil on panel, 58.7 × 85.7 cm. Baltimore, Walters Art Museum. © The Walters Art Museum

[page 345] [page 346]

Provenance

NG 2632 may be the picture lent by Boucheron to the Diaz exhibition at the Ecole des Beaux‐Arts, Paris, 1877;9 in the collection of Charles‐Fortunat‐Paul Casimir‐Périer (1812–1897) in 1892;10 in the collection of Alexander Young (1828–1907) by 1898, when loaned to the Guildhall exhibition; sold by Young with the rest of his collection to Agnew’s in 1906; bought from Agnew’s by George Salting (1835–1909), 1907;11 placed on loan to the National Gallery, 1907; Salting Bequest 1910.

Former Owners: Boucheron and Casimir‐Périer

Boucheron must be identified as the jeweller Frédéric Boucheron (1830–1902), who opened his first boutique in the Palais Royal in 1858, moving to the place Vendôme in 1893.12 Charles‐Fortunat‐Paul Casimir‐Périer was the son of Casimir‐Pierre Périer (1777–1832), a banker and minister of the interior under Louis‐Philippe. Paul Casimir‐Périer was also a banker, and a serious amateur photographer who was a founding member of the Société française de photographie.13

Exhibitions

Possibly Paris 1877 (28, L’Orage, dated 1871), lent by Boucheron; Paris 1892 (72), lent by M. Paul Casimir‐Périer; London 1898 (105), lent by Alexander Young; Glasgow 1901 (1402), lent by Alexander Young; London 1910b (not numbered); Portsmouth, Nottingham, Stoke‐on‐Trent, Barnard Castle and London 1980 (6); London 1986 (not numbered); Lyons 2002 (50); Washington and Houston 2008 (97); London 2009 (31 in accompanying book). On long‐term loan from George Salting to the National Gallery from 1907 to 1910; long‐term loan to Manchester City Art Gallery from unknown date to October 1919 ; long‐term loan to the Arts Council of Great Britain, Scarborough Art Gallery, from May 1952 to May 1954 .

Literature

Burlington Magazine, LXIII, 1908, p. 340; Davies and Gould 1970, p. 61; Johnston 1982, p. 64; White, Pilc and Kirby 1998, pp. 83 and 93; Roy 1999, pp. 335, 336; Pomarède 2002, no. 50 and p. 201; Brettell and Eisenmann Eisenman 2006, p. 126; Miquel 2006, I, illustrated p. 165; II, p. 240, no. 1526.

Notes

1 The author is grateful to Jon Whiteley for identifying this mark. (Back to text.)

2 A painting by Théodore Rousseau, Hoarfrost (1845; Baltimore, Walters Art Museum), which is on canvas, was also in the collection of Paul Casimir‐Périer. The painting’s conservation records were kindly checked, but no record of such a seal was found (email from Karen J. French, Senior Conservator of Paintings, 30 November 2012). Neither does a painting in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Dupré, Cows Crossing a Ford), also from Casimir‐Périer’s collection, bear such a device (email of 16 February 2017 from Asher Miller, Assistant Curator, European Paintings). (Back to text.)

3 These results were reported in White, Pilc and Kirby 1998, p. 93. (Back to text.)

4 Dated 1871. Oil on panel (parqueté), 61 × 76.5 cm (almost identical to NG 2632). Miquel 2006, no. 1518. Although Miquel gives a fairly complete provenance for this painting, it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that it is NG 2623 2632 ; the reproduction is not of sufficient quality to say for certain. (Back to text.)

5 Miquel 2006, no. 1513. Others with the trees transposed to the left are Miquel 2006, nos 542, 1543 and 1340. Miquel compares NG 2632 with his nos 1050 and 1340, describing his no. 1050 as a replica of NG 2632. The disposition of the trees is the same but the landscape is different: there is no path running through the composition, but a pool in the foreground instead; the sky is also somewhat lighter. A further example is The Storm, Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto (Miquel 2006, no. 1627), a powerful landscape from a somewhat higher viewpoint looking down onto the plain with its lone figure. (Back to text.)

6 See Johnston 1982, p. 64, who lists variants which have appeared in the sales rooms and in the Witt Library. (Back to text.)

7 Miquel 2006, no. 1630. (Back to text.)

8 Oil on canvas, 84.4 × 105.6 cm. Brettell and Eisenmann Eisenman 2006, p. 126. (Back to text.)

9 This is surmised by Davies on the basis of the title alone; no dimensions are given in the exhibition catalogue. There are, however, other possible candidates, all signed and dated 1871, such as Miquel 2006, no. 1518 (for which see note 4); ibid. , no. 1508, Storm. Effect over the Heath; ibid. , no. 340, The Storm, formerly Tauber collection; ibid. , no. 1220, Storm in the Forest of Fontainebleau (Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Museum) and ibid. , no. 1618, Apremont, Stormy Weather. It should also be noted that no. 93 in the 1877 Diaz exhibition might be identical to NG 2632: Stormy Weather, belonging to Mme Paul Casimir‐Périer. (Back to text.)

10 The author is grateful to Colin Harrison for identifying NG 2632 as the picture owned by Casimir Périer Casimir-Périer . (Back to text.)

11 In Salting’s notebook, ‘Diaz (large) “L’Orage” (Alex Young Cn) who refused £7000 for it. Salting puts the value at £5,500 (NG Archives). In Agnew’s stockbook of Young’s paintings the picture is no. 184, Young no. 848, bought by Salting on 7 July 1907 for £2,500. The author is grateful to Agnew’s for allowing access to the stockbook for Young’s collection; this now forms part of Agnew’s archive acquired by the National Gallery in 2014. For Young and Salting see pp. 22–3 in the present volume. (Back to text.)

12 Boucheron’s picture collection in the Palais Royal was visited by William Vanderbilt (1821–1885), as recounted in the New York Times on 4 May 1902 in an article on Vanderbilt’s own collection. He owned two paintings by Corot, Beaune‐la‐Rolande. Le Château de la Motte‐Bastille (Robaut 1905, no. 760) and La Petite Vanne (Environs d’Epernon) (Robaut 1905, no. 1331), which he loaned to an exhibition at the Ecole des Beaux‐Arts in 1875, and to further exhibitions in 1878, 1883 (Cent chefs‐d’oeuvre des collections Parisiennes, Georges Petit, Paris , to which he lent pictures by Corot and Fromentin) and 1892. Boucheron also loaned a painting by Troyon, The Coming Storm (1860), mentioned in the New York Times article; this is now in the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown. Boucheron is not listed in Lugt as having had a sale. (Back to text.)

13 Casimir‐Périer collected mostly Dutch seventeenth‐century painting and Barbizon landscapes, for which see Kelly 2004. He was mainly active as a collector in the 1840s, but sold the bulk of his collection at auction in 1846 (Catalogue de tableaux et dessins de l’école moderne … Collection de M.Paul Périer, 19 December 1846). He had a further sale on 26 April 1898 (which was checked for NG 2632), as Young may conceivably have purchased it there. However, although the sale contained a number of paintings by Diaz, none had dimensions corresponding with those of NG 2632. The two sons of Casimir‐Pierre Périer, Auguste and Charles‐Fortunat‐Paul, both officially carried the family surname of Casimir‐Périer from March 1874. See Choulet 1894, p. 168, and p. 226, note 1, where he states: ‘La signature de M. Paul Casimir‐Périer porte un accent’. (Back to text.)

[page [347]]
Fig. 4

Detail of NG 2632. © The National Gallery, London

List of archive references cited

List of references cited

Anon. 1908
Anon., ‘The French School in the Nineteenth‐Century’, Burlington Magazine, 1908, 13327–44
Brettell and Eisenman 2006
BrettellRichard R. and Stephen F. EisenmanNineteenth‐Century Art in the Norton Simon MuseumNew Haven and London 2006, I
Caulfield 1986
CaulfieldPatrickThe Artist’s Eye: Patrick Caulfield. An Exhibition of National Gallery Paintings selected by the Artist (exh. cat. National Gallery, London), London 1986
Choulet 1894
ChouletEugèneLa Famille Casimir‐Périer: Etude généalogique, biographique et historique d’après des documents des archives de Grenoble, de Vizille et de l’IsèreGrenoble 1894
Davies and Gould 1970
DaviesMartinrevised by Cecil GouldNational Gallery Catalogues: French School Early 19th Century, Impressionists, Post‐Impressionists, etc.London 1970
Diaz 1877
Exposition des œuvres de N. Diaz de la Peña à l’Ecole nationale des beaux‐arts … notice biographique par Jules Claretie (exh. cat. Ecole Nationale des Beaux‐Arts, Paris), Paris 1877
Egerton 1998
EgertonJudyNational Gallery Catalogues: The British SchoolLondon 1998
Herring and Mazzotta 2009
HerringSarah and Antonio MazzottaCorot to Monet: A Fresh Look at Landscape from the Collection (exh. cat. National Gallery, London), London 2009
Johnston 1982
JohnstonWilliam R.The Nineteenth Century Paintings in the Walters Art GalleryBaltimore 1982
Kelly 2004
KellySimon, ‘Early Patrons of the Barbizon School: The 1840s’, Journal of the History of Collections, 2004, 162161–72
Lugt 1938–87
LugtFritsRépertoire des catalogues de ventes publiques intéressant l’art ou la curiosité … par Frits Lugt (Deuxième Période, 1826–1860 (1953); Troisième Période, 1861–1900 (1964); Quatrième Période, 1901–1925, 1987), 4 volsThe Hague 1938–87
Miquel 2006
MiquelPierre and Rolande MiquelNarcisse Diaz de la Peña (1807–1876). Monographie et catalogue raisonné de l’oeuvre peint2 volsParis 2006
New York Times 1902
New York Times, 4 May 1902
Pomarède et al. 2002
PomarèdeVincentGérard de Wallenset al.L’Ecole de Barbizon. Peindre en plein air avant l’impressionnisme (exh. cat. Musée des Beaux‐Arts, Lyons), Lyons 2002
Robaut 1905
RobautAlfredL’Oeuvre de Corot. Catalogue raisonné et illustré précedé de l’Histoire de Corot et de ses oeuvres par Étienne Moreau‐Nélaton, ornée de dessins et croquis originaux du maître4 volsParis 1905
Roy 1999
RoyAshok, ‘Barbizon Painters: Tradition and Innovation in Artists’ Materials’, in Barbizon. Malerei der Natur – Natur der Malerei, eds Andreas BurmesterChristoph Heilmann and Michael F. Zimmermann (rev. papers from international symposium held in 1996 (Im Auftrag der Bayerischen Staatsgemäldesammlungen, des Doerner Institutes und des Zentralinstitutes für Kunstgeschichte, München)), Munich 1999, 330–42
Temple 1898
TempleA.G.Examples of French ArtLondon 1898
White, Pilc and Kirby 1998
WhiteRaymondJennifer Pilc and Jo Kirby, ‘Analyses of Paint Media’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 1998, 1974–95

List of exhibitions cited

Glasgow 1901
Glasgow, Glasgow International Exhibition, 1901
London 1898
London, Guildhall, Corporation of London Art Gallery, Loan Collection of Pictures by Painters of the French School, 1898 (exh. cat.: Temple 1898)
London 1907–10
London, National Gallery, long-term loan from George Salting, 1907–10
London, National Gallery, Exhibition in Room XV, the German Gallery, National Gallery, London, of the most important pictures bequeathed by Salting, 1910
London, National Gallery, The Artist’s Eye: An Exhibition Selected by Patrick Caulfield, 1986 (exh. cat.: Caulfield 1986)
London 2009
London, National Gallery, Corot to Monet: A Fresh Look at Landscape from the Collection, 2009
Lyons 2002
Lyons, Musée des Beaux‐Arts, L’Ecole de Barbizon. Peindre en plein air avant l’impressionnisme, 2002
Manchester 1919
Manchester, Manchester City Art Gallery, long-term loan, unknown date–October 1919
Paris 1875
Paris, Ecole Nationale des Beaux‐Arts, Exposition de l’Oeuvre de Corot, 1875
Paris 1877
Paris, Ecole Nationale des Beaux‐Arts, Exposition des oeuvres de N. Diaz de la Peña, 1877
Paris 1878
Paris, Galerie Durand Ruel, Exposition Rétrospective de Tableaux & Dessins de Maîtres Modernes, 1878
Paris 1892
Paris, Galerie Georges Petit, Cent Chefs‐d’Oeuvre des Collections françaises et étrangères, 1892
Portsmouth, Nottingham, Stoke‐on‐Trent, Barnard Castle and London 1980
Portsmouth, Portsmouth City Museum; Nottingham, Nottingham University Art Gallery; Stoke‐on‐Trent, Stoke City Museum and Art Gallery; Barnard Castle, Bowes Museum; London, National Gallery, The National Gallery Lends: French 19th Century Paintings of Town and Country, 1980
Scarborough 1952–4
Scarborough, Scarborough Art Gallery, long-term loan, May 1952–May 1954; organised through the Arts Council of Great Britain
Washington and Houston 2008
Washington, National Gallery of Art; Houston, Museum of Fine Arts, In the Forest of Fontainebleau: Painters and Photographers from Corot to Monet, 2008

The Scope and Presentation of the Catalogue

The paintings catalogued in this volume are, for the most part, landscapes dating from the early nineteenth century through to the early 1870s, by mainly French artists working before and overlapping slightly with their successors, the Impressionists.

Swiss, Flemish and Belgian landscapists in the collection have been included. Denis and Cels (the latter painting later in the century) both worked in the oil sketching tradition which, while centred in Italy at the beginning of the century, was international in scope. The Swiss landscape artist Calame also practised oil sketching and his studio works were very much informed by French academic landscape practice. Finally, we thought it appropriate to include the British artist Bonington, who spent much of his short life in France, and was a pivotal figure between the French and British traditions. At the time Judy Egerton published her magisterial catalogue of the British School in 1998, there was no painting by Bonington in the collection to provoke discussion of the cross‐Channel artistic ferment his art initiated. Happily, that lacuna has been filled.

The bulk of the catalogue is made up of artists associated with the Barbizon School, among them Corot – of whom the Gallery holds a substantial collection, from his earliest to his latest work – Daubigny and Rousseau. Despite his being a friend and associate of Corot and Daubigny, the one work in the collection by Honoré‐Victorin Daumier has been excluded, as he was not a landscape artist. On the other hand, it did not not not make sense to split up works by such artists as Corot, Millet and Courbet, and examples of their figurative paintings have been included.

While these artists were regular exhibitors at the Salon, only one painting in the collection, Millet’s The Winnower, was actually shown at a Salon, that of 1848. For the most part the paintings are small in scale, some probably painted with private collectors or the market in mind, others intimate recordings of landscapes, started, and in some cases, completed cases completed, in the open air. As the essay on the history of the collection discusses, the National Gallery, in common with other British institutions around 1900, was hesitant in its collecting of such work, and the first acquisitions came as gifts or bequests from private collections. In fact, the vast majority of the works in this catalogue came to the Gallery as bequests or gifts, meaning that it has been dependent for such works on the generosity of private collectors. Such a lack of proactive purchasing has inevitably resulted in lacunae, notably in works by the Barbizon painters Constant Troyon (1810–1865) and Charles‐Emile Jacque (1813–1894). In recent years oil studies have been purchased. These holdings have been increased significantly by eight studies generously given by John Lishawa in 2019, a gift alas too late to be included in this volume. Neither have we been able to include a newly acquired painting by Bonington, On the Seine – Morning (acquired through HM Government’s Acceptance in Lieu of Inheritance Tax Scheme).

Each entry begins with technical information, the material provided by, and in its presentation, shaped very much by the input of colleagues from the Conservation and Scientific departments, Hayley Tomlinson, Gabriella Macaro, David Peggie and Nelly von Aderkas. The paintings were closely examined out of their frames, both with the naked eye and under magnification, using visible and ultraviolet light. In addition, x‐radiographs X‐radiographs were made of many of the paintings and some works were also examined using infrared reflectography. Infrared reflectography was carried out using the digital infrared scanning camera OSIRIS which contains an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) sensor. Paint samples obtained from the works were generally examined in cross‐section which allowed for analysis of preparatory layers as well as the identification of pigments and paint layer structures, providing an understanding of the artists’ working methods. Stereo‐microscopy, scanning electron microscope with energy‐dispersive x‐ray X‐ray detection (SEM–EDX), and in some cases Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR), were the main analytical instruments used in the identification of pigments and preparatory layers. In addition, binding media analysis was carried out on samples using gas‐chromatography (GC) or gas‐chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS) while information on the dye sources used in the red or yellow lake pigments was obtained using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

As the nineteenth century was a period of great evolution in methods of working and materials available, particularly among landscape painters, we decided to complement the material presented in the individual entries with two essays providing more of an overview of developments in the practice and reception of landscape. These are accompanied by an essay detailing the collection of these paintings by the National Gallery itself.

The technical material is followed by discussion of the painting, with provenance and sections on exhibitions and literature. In some entries separate paragraphs are devoted to former owners, particularly in the case of less well‐known individuals and when there is speculation as to the identity of a particular collector. For that reason, such figures as Lucian Freud, who need no introduction, are not dealt with in this way.

About this version

Version 3, generated from files SH_2019__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 and database__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 using stylesheet 16_teiToHtml_externalDb.xsl dated 03/01/2025. Refactored handling of main images for each entry; entries for NG2058, NG2622, NG2632, NG2634, NG2876, NG3296, NG6253, NG6447, NG6603, NG6651-NG6654 and NG6660, and previously-published ‘taster’ entries for NG2625 and NG3237, proofread and corrected.

Cite this entry

Permalink (this version)
https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DWL-000B-0000-0000
Permalink (latest version)
https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DD3-000B-0000-0000
Chicago style
Herring, Sarah. “NG 2632, The Storm”. 2019, online version 3, March 2, 2025. https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DWL-000B-0000-0000.
Harvard style
Herring, Sarah (2019) NG 2632, The Storm. Online version 3, London: National Gallery, 2025. Available at: https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DWL-000B-0000-0000 (Accessed: 31 March 2025).
MHRA style
Herring, Sarah, NG 2632, The Storm (National Gallery, 2019; online version 3, 2025) <https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DWL-000B-0000-0000> [accessed: 31 March 2025]