Skip to main content

Main image

Willows, with a Man Fishing:
Catalogue entry

Catalogue contents

About the catalogue

Entry details

Full title
Willows, with a Man Fishing
Artist
Jules-Louis Dupré
Inventory number
NG2634
Author
Sarah Herring

Catalogue entry

, 2019

Extracted from:
Sarah Herring, The Nineteenth Century French Paintings (London: National Gallery Company and Yale University Press, 2019).

© The National Gallery, London

1850s

Oil on canvas, 21.7 × 27.1 cm1

Signed bottom left: Jules Dupré

Support

The canvas is unlined and the stretcher is original. The tacking edges, which are present all round, are covered by the off‐white ground, which strongly suggests that the canvas was cut from a larger primed piece and was probably commercially prepared. There are very small overlaps of paint on the right and bottom edges.

There are five wax seals on the back of the stretcher. One (fig. 1, centre), while very rubbed, has been identified as that of former owner John Waterloo Wilson, which features a rampant wolf with a star between its paws, surrounded by the inscription: ‘Collection John. W. Wilson’. A second seal, with the letters ‘L’ and ‘G’ interlaced within a rectangular surround (fig. 1, bottom), has been identified as that of the Belgian art dealer Léon Gauchez.2 The third seal features a decorative pattern surrounding a raised area. The latter two are more detailed, with the fourth (fig. 2, bottom) showing two sets of crossed swords (pointing downwards, with both right‐hand swords clearly held by a hand), one set above the other, and flanked with decorative scrolls. The fifth seal (fig. 2, top) has a shield bearing vertical lines and decorative scrolls to either side, surmounted with a (sea‐)horse’s head.3 The Goupil number ‘27686’ is written in blue crayon, and in blue crayon on the [page 349] [page 350] middle stretcher bar, ‘36’ with ‘26’ beside it, and underneath [?]B.C.’.

Figs 1 and 2

The five wax seals on the back of NG 2634. © The National Gallery, London

© The National Gallery, London

Fig. 3

Detail from NG 2634 showing white highlights on the tree trunk. © The National Gallery, London

Materials and Technique

The canvas was prepared with a double off‐white ground. The lower ground layer consists of a lead white and chalk mixture, whereas the upper layer is predominantly lead white. Extending the relatively expensive lead white pigment with cheaper substances such as chalk was common practice in nineteenth‐century commercial primings, especially in the lower layer of a double ground, which would not be seen on the surface. The sky was painted with two to three layers containing varying quantities of French ultramarine, viridian, cobalt blue, emerald green, yellow earth and Prussian blue, with emerald green, viridian, French ultramarine and cobalt blue in the highlights.4 Naples yellow is also present in the creamy yellow colour of the clouds. The green foliage was painted with viridian, red and yellow earth and Prussian blue, and some highlights with yellow earth, viridian, chrome yellow and emerald green.

Medium analysis has identified poppyseed oil as the binder in the paint from the sky and the dark green of the foliage. The green paint has been heat‐bodied.

The picture is generally very thickly painted, although in areas the ground can be seen through the paint surface, for example through the sky close to the upper left‐hand edge. The sky was painted first, with a reserve left for the dense inner branches of the trees. The trees were then painted, with their hearts painted directly onto the ground and the thinner outer branches added on top of the sky. The artist then took up the sky colour again and filled in any gaps where the ground was showing through. While the evidence here contradicts Claretie’s statement that Dupré believed in painting the sky last, as with Corot he held it to be of great importance in a picture: ‘the sky is in front of a tree, in a tree behind a tree, it is everywhere; – the sky, it is the air’.5 The trunks are painted in very thick impasto and are highlighted with white, cream and light green paint (fig. 3). The pond is full of highlights and reflections laid on the surface, which originally would have been a dull green. Some of these are laid on horizontally with a dry brush, some vertically, such as the streaks of bright blue to the left and the numerous strokes of green around the water’s edge denoting the reeds. A similar effect is achieved in the grassy plain behind, with lighter and yellowish greens dragged across the initial darker green. The resulting painting surface is extremely textured.

Conservation and Condition

NG 2634 has not been cleaned or restored by the National Gallery at any point. It is generally in good condition, although there is damage in the sky, right of centre, which is covered by darkened retouching. There is an unfilled loss at the upper left edge, as well as other scattered losses along the edges, especially at the lower edge and the top right corner edge. There is some cracking, not prominent, and the even varnish is somewhat yellowed.

[page 351]
Fig. 4

Jules‐Louis Dupré, A Fisherman and his Boat at the Edge of a Lake, 1850–60. Oil on canvas, 81 × 100 cm. Warsaw, National Museum. © Muzeum Narodowe w Warszawie / Ligier Piotr

Discussion

A pond, or possibly a river (the water extends beyond both left and right edges) is bordered by willows on the far side. A man stands in the water, fishing. Beyond lies a grassy plain with bushes in the distance, and possibly blue hills on the horizon. Despite the overcast sky (but note the intense blue glimpsed at the top), the picture gives the impression of a bright, sunlit day through a myriad of small touches of paint resulting in a jewel‐like surface. In particular the extensive use of white highlights could be the result of Dupré’s study of paintings by John Constable during his trip to England, which took place sometime between 1831 and 1834.

This intimate scene is according to Aubrun a work from the 1850s, a period when, after his break with Théodore Rousseau, Dupré preferred to stay in L’Isle‐Adam, north of Paris in the Ile de France, where he painted a sequence of river scenes and fishermen. Aubrun cites A Fisherman and his Boat at the Edge of a Lake (fig. 4)6 as a model for Dupré’s landscapes of the 1850s, both in terms of subject (water, fisherman) and its handling and quality of light. NG 2634 can also be particularly compared with Willows (fig. 5),7 in which a hill runs down to the river bank on the left, a flat plain lies to the right, with cottages in the distance, and a cluster of willows is reflected in the water. On the left a tree leans to the right, crossing over an upright trunk directly behind; this grouping also appears at the centre of NG 2634. A further painting that shares its intimate pastoral nature is Watering Place (fig. 6), a peaceful scene with cows in the water and a group of willows on the far bank.8

Engravings

(1) Engraving by Théophile Chauvel (1831–1910), in Collection de M. John W. Wilson exposée dans la Galerie du Cercle Artistique et Littéraire de Bruxelles au profit des pauvres de cette ville, Paris [page 352] 1873, p. 152, and again in the Wilson sale catalogue.

Fig. 5

Jules Laurens after Jules‐Louis Dupré, Willows, about 1850. Lithograph, 22 × 17.2 cm. London, The British Museum. © The Trustees of the British Museum

Fig. 6

Jules‐Louis Dupré, Watering Place. Oil on canvas, 38.1 × 51.8 cm. Boston, Museum of Fine Arts, Bequest of David P. Kimball in memory of his wife Clara Bertram Kimball. © 2019 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

(2) Engraving by Emile Florentin Daumont (born 1834) in the Dussol sale catalogue.

Provenance

NG 2634 was possibly in the collection of Duplessis in 1867 (see Exhibitions), perhaps Georges Victor Gratet‐Duplessis (1834–99);9 according to the Wilson sale catalogue, the picture was in the collection of Jules Van Praet (1806–1887) of Brussels. It was probably bought from Praet by his friend the art dealer Léon Gauchez (1825–1907); on 26 March 1871 Gauchez sold the painting to John Waterloo Wilson (1815–1883), the first Barbizon painting to enter his collection;10 his sale, 14 to 16 March 1881, lot 154, bought by Georges Petit for 8,800 francs;11 collection of Jean‐Louis Antoine Dussol (de Cette) (1835–1901); M.D… (Dussol) sale, Paris, 17 March 1884, lot 45, bought by the dealer Auguste Breysse for 10,100 francs;12 in the collection of Georges Lutz (1835–1901) by 1885; his sale, Paris, 26 and 27 May 1902, lot 60, bought by Boussod, Valadon & Cie for 29,000 francs;13 the Goupil number ‘27686’ is on the back of the picture. The provenance given for this number in the Goupil & Cie/Boussod, Valadon & Cie stockbooks is as follows: La Saulaie, bought by Goupil from Paul Chevallier (commissaire priseur at the Lutz sale), 3 June 1902; sold by Goupil on 18 April 1903 to William Marchant (1868–1925), manager from 1898 and owner from 1900 of the Goupil Gallery, the London branch of Boussod, Valadon & Cie;14 in the collection of banker Edward Hedley Cuthbertson (1862–?1944) of Bushey House, Bushey, Hertfordshire;15 his sale, London, 21 May 1909, lot 77, bought by Thomas Wallis (1837–1916) for £1,050 (the son of Henry Wallis, of Wallis & Son, or The French Gallery); bought by George Salting (1835–1909) from Wallis in August 1909;16 Salting Bequest, 1910; for a time at the Tate Gallery; transferred in 1956.

Former Owners: Van Praet, Wilson, Dussol and Lutz

Distinguished historian Jules Van Praet was a minister under Belgian kings Leopold I (1790–1865) and Leopold II (1835–1909). He assembled his collection with the assistance of the dealer Arthur Stevens (1825–1899), brother of the artist Alfred Stevens (1823–1906).17 Textile manufacturer and distinguished collector John Waterloo Wilson (1815–1883), of English nationality, was born in Brussels and lived for 30 years in Holland. In 1878 he donated 27 pictures (mostly Dutch and Flemish seventeenth‐century) to the city of Brussels, to which was added a sum of 300,000 francs in his will for the purchase of further paintings.18 Jean‐Louis Antoine Dussol was a merchant in shook (bois merrains) at 58 route de Montpellier, Cette (now Sète), in 1880. When his business got into difficulties he sold his collection in 1884, subsequently forming a more modest collection in later years.19 Georges Lutz was the owner of a factory making tools for leather tanners and curriers.20

Exhibitions

Possibly Paris 1867b (Groupe I, Oeuvres d’Art, France [236, La Saulée], lent by Duplessis); Brussels 1873 (p. 152 of the catalogue); Paris 1885 (38; Lutz collection); Paris 1889b (327, lent by Lutz);21 London 1910a (91, River scene: man fishing); Bristol 1932 (14); London 1932 (138); London 1974b (40); London 2009 (24 in accompanying book).

Literature

Tardieu 1873–4, IV, p. 47; Eudel 1885, pp. 238–9; Davies and Gould 1970, pp. 63–4; Aubrun 1974, no. 233;22 White, Pilc and Kirby 1998, pp. 80–1 and 93; Roy 1999, p. 337; Watson 2016, p. 87.

[page 353]

Notes

1 The dimensions of a standard no. 3 figure canvas are 22 × 27 cm. (Back to text.)

2 The seals were identified by Ingrid Goddeeris, Scientific Assistant, Musée des Beaux‐Arts de Belgique, Brussels, in an email of 22 September 2015. See also Goddeeris 2016, pp. 61–2. (Back to text.)

3 The other seals almost certainly relate to the other former owners listed under Provenance but as yet these have not been identified. A painting by Courbet, The Fishing Boat (New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art), also came from Dussol’s collection. In an email of 21 February 2017, Asher Miller, Assistant Curator, European Paintings, kindly confirmed that there is no wax seal recorded on the back of the painting. (Back to text.)

4 These green and blue pigments accord with Dupré’s palette as set out in Claretie 1884, p. 187. (Back to text.)

5 Ibid. , pp. 186–7: ‘Le ciel est devant un arbre, dans un arbre, derrière un arbre, il est partout; – le ciel, c’est l’air’. (Back to text.)

6 Aubrun 1982, no. 63. (Back to text.)

7 Aubrun 1974, no. 672, whereabouts unknown. The lithograph by Jules Laurens (1825–1901) is fig. 5, p. 3 49 51 in the present volume. (Back to text.)

8 Aubrun 1974, no. 401. Two further paintings with the subject of willows listed in Aubrun are Willows of about 1880 (whereabouts unknown; Aubrun 1982, no. 198) and Willows on the Banks of a Lake with Cows of the beginning of 1880s (Aubrun 1982, no. 162. (Back to text.)

9 Assistant Keeper in the Print Room at the Bibliothèque nationale, Paris, and author of Histoire de la Gravure, Paris 1880. (Back to text.)

10 See Goddeeris 2016, p. 76, and Watson 2016, p. 87. NG 2634 is no. 36 in Wilson’s stockbook: ‘Galerie J.W. Wilson. Stockbook and letters received, ca. 1870–1885’, Getty Provenance Index. Information regarding the stockbook kindly supplied by Wilson’s great‐great‐grandson, Mr Bram Dudok van Heel (email, 2 February 2017). (Back to text.)

11 According to L’Année Artistique, année 4, 1881–2, p. 120, NG 2634 was bought by the industrialist Eugène Secrétan (1836–1899) (information kindly supplied by Mr Dudok van Heel, 2 February 2017). Sécretan’s collection (which included Millet’s The Angelus, now Paris, Musée d’Orsay, bought by Secrétan at Wilson’s sale of 1881) was sold at Charles Sedelmeyer’s gallery on 1 July 1889. If this picture was indeed bought by Secrétan, or possibly by Petit on his behalf, then it left his collection for Dussol’s prior to this sale. (Back to text.)

12 The dealer Auguste Breysse had premises at 49 boulevard de Clichy, Paris. The annotated catalogue in the Bibliothèque nationale gives the name of the buyer as ‘Bresse’ (note by Ronald Alley in NG 2634 dossier). However, this appears to be a misspelling, as Corot’s Bohemian with Mandolin, also in the Dussol sale, is cited by Robaut 1905 (no. 1996) as being sold to M. Breysse. (Back to text.)

14 Goupil book 15, stock no. 27686, p. 86, row 13, Getty Provenance Index. Dates and information regarding William Marchant are taken from The Correspondence of James McNeill Whistler, 1855–1903, eds Margaret F. MacDonald, Patricia de Montfort and Nigel Thorp; including The Correspondence of Anna McNeill Whistler, 1855–1880, ed. Georgia Toutziari; consulted online at University of Glasgow, www.whistler.arts.gla.ac.uk (accessed 16 January 2017).

The provenance set out in Aubrun 1974 is slightly different: bought by Goupil on 23 November 1902 from Boussod, Valadon & Cie and sold by Goupil on 7 February 1903. (Back to text.)

15 See notice in The Times, 20 May 1909, ‘The Cuthbertson Collection’, which states that the collector was selling off his collection as he was leaving his house at Bushey, Hertfordshire. The notice also states that ‘Mr Cuthbertson acquired all his most important works in quite recent years.’ He arrived in New York on 21 May 1909, aged 47 (for which see the Ellis Island Ship database, www.libertyellisfoundation.org, accessed April 2004); he is also recorded as arriving on 22 February 1915 aged 52 years and 2 months. The New York Times reported on 18 June 1909 that he and another banker, Charles Kaufman, bought the Union Dime Savings Bank Building on Broadway. They also had significant interests in Australia and were members of the De Beers diamond mining syndicate in South Africa. A legal notice in The Times, 14 February 1945, regarding the estate of Edward Hedley Cuthbertson, late of Ashington, Nevill Road, Rottingdean, Sussex, who died on 12 August 1944, possibly relates to the same person. (Back to text.)

16 The entry in Salting notebook reads: ‘Jules Dupré “La Soulaie” (Cuthbertson Sale 77)/A sluggish stream, with willows, peasant angling [£]1100’ (NG Archive). The catalogue entry in the Cuthbertson sale reads: ‘La Soulaie, a sluggish stream, with willows‐trees; a peasant‐boy angling from the bank’. The Salting papers in the London Metropolitan Archives hold an invoice from Wallis dated 21 August 1909 for two paintings: ‘La Soulaie by Jules Dupré [NG 2634] cost about £1100, a picture by Corot, Early Morning – Ville d’Avray [NG 2630], cost about £1600, to be paid for by cheque for £2,200’. It appears that a further picture by Corot was part exchanged for the above two. It is noted on the invoice that it was worth £300 but £500 was allowed for exchange. This last picture is presumably the same as that mentioned in Salting’s notebook, ‘early morning in a garden (costs £330 or so) value 500 600’. Metropolitan Archives, inv. CLC/B/173/MS 19473. (Back to text.)

17 On Van Praet see Wauters 1890, Discailles 1918 and Bronne 1983, esp. chap. XI, ‘Le Cabinet d’un amateur’. On his relationship with Arthur Stevens see Goddeeris, ‘The Three Stevens Brothers: Two Exhibitions of 1850 and 1880’, in Goddeeris 2009, pp. 177–97, esp. pp. 184–9. See also Bary 1864, and Tardieu 1880. Wauters (1890, p. 538) cites two paintings by Dupré in Van Praet’s collection, La Vanne and Le Pêcheur (NG 2634). Discailles also states that Van Praet’s collection was destined for the state, but that negotiations foundered after the death of his nephews, and the collection was sold off to English and American collectors. (Back to text.)

18 These gifts resulted in the inauguration of the Musée Communal de Bruxelles in 1887, now called the Musée de la Ville de Bruxelles. Housed in the Maison du Roi, Grand‐Place, it contains a room in Wilson’s honour, presided over by a monument in his memory by Paul de Vigne (1843–1901). See Le Roy 1948, p. 8, Fransolet 1960, pp. 81–2, and Vrebos 2016. (Back to text.)

19 Information regarding his dates and collection kindly supplied by Hervé Le Blanche (email of 14 February 2018), the details coming from Dussol’s family. A business letter of ‘Jean Louis Dussol et Cie’ with the address 58 route de Montpellier was with www.delcampe.net. The town of Cette (south‐west of Montpellier, in the Hérault department) changed its name to Sète in 1928. Eudel refers to him as ‘Dussol, de Cette’ and writes of his ‘collection de province’, of which NG 2634 was ‘the pearl’. Eudel 1885, pp. 238–9. (Back to text.)

20 Loiseau writes of two paintings by Dupré in Lutz’s collection, Willows and Return to the Farm, both hanging in Lutz’s small drawing room in his flat in the Marais. Loiseau 1901, p. 305. See also Saunier 1902. His dates are from Auffret 2004, p. 146. (Back to text.)

21 According to Miquel, at the Exposition Centennale of 1883 Dupré exhibited, among other paintings, Willows (belonging to M. Lutz). In fact it was to the Exposition Universelle of 1889 that Lutz lent NG 2634, under the title La Saulaie. Miquel 1975–87, II, p. 397. (Back to text.)

22 Aubrun 1974, no. 876, also appears to be NG 2634. It is listed as ‘La Saulaie, 20.4 × 26.6 cm’ in the Cuthbertson sale, 21 May 1909 (current location unknown). (Back to text.)

List of archive references cited

  • London, Metropolitan Archives, inv. CLC/B/173/MS 19473: Agnew, receipt, 8 December 1906

List of references cited

Aubrun 1974
AubrunMarie‐MadeleineJules Dupré 1811–1889. Catalogue raisonné de l’Oeuvre peint, dessiné et gravéParis 1974 ((supplement), Nantes 1982)
Auffret 2004
AuffretFrançoisJohan Barthold Jongkind 1819–1891: héritier contemporain et précurseur: biographie illustréeParis 2004
Bary 1864
BaryEmile, ‘Une visite chez M. van Praet’, L’Office de Publicité, 26 October 1864
Bronne 1983
BronneCarloJules van Praet, conseiller et confident de Leopold IerBrussels 1983
Claretie 1884
ClaretieJulesPeintres et Sculpteurs contemporains. Deuxième série. Artistes vivants au 1er janvier 1881Paris 1884
Cuthbertson Collection 1909
he Cuthbertson Collection’, The Times, 20 May 1909
Davies and Gould 1970
DaviesMartinrevised by Cecil GouldNational Gallery Catalogues: French School Early 19th Century, Impressionists, Post‐Impressionists, etc.London 1970
Discailles 1918
reference not found
Duplessis 1880
Gratet‐DuplessisGeorges VictorHistoire de la GravureParis 1880
Egerton 1998
EgertonJudyNational Gallery Catalogues: The British SchoolLondon 1998
Eudel 1885
EudelPaulL’Hôtel Drouot et la Curiosité en 1883 – 4: quatrième année, avec une préface par ChampfleuryParis 1885
Fransolet 1960
FransoletMarietteLe sculpteur Paul Vigne, 1843–1901. Etude biographique et catalogue des oeuvresBrussels 1960
Getty Research Institute n.d.
Getty Research InstituteGetty Provenance Index®https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/provenance/search.html, accessed 25 October 2021, Los Angeles n.d.
Goddeeris 2009
GoddeerisIngrid, ‘The Three Stevens Brothers: Two Exhibitions of 1850 and 1880’, in Alfred Stevens 1823–1906. Brussels‐ParisIngrid Goddeeriset al. (exh. cat. Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels; Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam), Amsterdam 2009, 177–97
Goddeeris 2016
GoddeerisIngrid, ‘La contribution de Léon Gauchez dans la constitution, valorisation et diffusion de la collection de tableaux de John Waterloo Wilson’, Cahiers Bruxellois/Brusselse Cahiershttps://www.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-2016-1-page-41.htm, 2016, XLVIII141–81
Goddeeris et al. 2009
GoddeerisIngridet al.Alfred Stevens 1823–1906. Brussels‐Paris (exh. cat. Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels; Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam), Amsterdam 2009
Herring and Mazzotta 2009
HerringSarah and Antonio MazzottaCorot to Monet: A Fresh Look at Landscape from the Collection (exh. cat. National Gallery, London), London 2009
L’Année Artistique 1881–2
L’Année Artistique, 1881–2, année 4120
Le Roy 1948
Le RoyGeorgesMusée Communal de la ville de Bruxelles en la Maison du Roi. Catalogue sommaireBrussels 1948
Loiseau 1901
LoiseauGeorges, ‘Nos Collectionneurs. M. Georges Lutz’, Le Magasin Pittoresque, May 1901, 301–6
Miquel 1975–87
MiquelPierreLe Paysage français au XIXe siècle 1824–1874. L’Ecole de la nature (I–III: Maurs‐la‐Jolie (1975); IV: Le paysge français au XIXe siècle, 1840–1900 (1985); V: Paysage et Société 1800–1900 (1985); VI: L’Art et L’Argent, 1800–1900 (1987)), 1975–87, I–III
New York Times 1909
New York Times, 18 June 1909
Robaut 1905
RobautAlfredL’Oeuvre de Corot. Catalogue raisonné et illustré précedé de l’Histoire de Corot et de ses oeuvres par Étienne Moreau‐Nélaton, ornée de dessins et croquis originaux du maître4 volsParis 1905
Roy 1999
RoyAshok, ‘Barbizon Painters: Tradition and Innovation in Artists’ Materials’, in Barbizon. Malerei der Natur – Natur der Malerei, eds Andreas BurmesterChristoph Heilmann and Michael F. Zimmermann (rev. papers from international symposium held in 1996 (Im Auftrag der Bayerischen Staatsgemäldesammlungen, des Doerner Institutes und des Zentralinstitutes für Kunstgeschichte, München)), Munich 1999, 330–42
Saunier 1902
SaunierCharles, ‘La Collection Lutz’, Gazette des Beaux‐Arts, 1902, 1425–8
Tardieu 1873–4
TardieuCharles, ‘Les Grandes Collections Étrangères. II M. John W. Wilson: I’, Gazette des Beaux‐Arts18738215–22; ‘II’, 18738319–36; ‘III’, 18738390–403; ‘IV’, 1874941–51
Tardieu 1880
TardieuCharles, ‘Le cabinet de Jules Van Praet’, L’Art. Revue hebdomadaire illustrée, 1880, IV278–80 & 299–304
Times 14 February 1945
The Times, 14 February 1945
Vrebos 2016
VrebosMartine, ‘John Waterloo Wilson en het Brusselse stadsmuseum’, Cahiers Bruxellois‐Brusselse Cahiershttps://www.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-2016-1-page-105.htm, 2016, 481105–33
Watson 2016
WatsonAndrew, ‘An Englishman in Paris: John Waterloo Wilson’s Remarkable Collection of French Nineteenth‐Century Art’, Cahiers Bruxellois‐Brusselse Cahiershttps://www.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-2016-1-page-83.htm, 2016, 48183–104
Wauters 1890
WautersAlphonse, ‘Notice sur Jules Van Praet’, Annuaire de l’Académie royale des Sciences, des Lettres et Beaux‐Arts de BelgiqueBrussels 1890, 511–43
Whistler 1855–80
University of GlasgowThe Correspondence of Anna McNeill Whistler, 1855–1880, ed. Georgia Toutziarihttps://www.whistler.arts.gla.ac.uk/, accessed 11 October 2018
Whistler 1855–1903
University of GlasgowThe Correspondence of James McNeill Whistler, 1855–1903, eds Margaret F. MacDonaldPatricia de Montfort and Nigel Thorphttps://www.whistler.arts.gla.ac.uk/, accessed 11 October 2018
White, Pilc and Kirby 1998
WhiteRaymondJennifer Pilc and Jo Kirby, ‘Analyses of Paint Media’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 1998, 1974–95
Wilson 1873
Collection de M. John W. Wilson exposée dans la Galerie du Cercle Artistique et Littéraire de Bruxelles au Profit des Pauvres de cette villeParis 1873

List of exhibitions cited

Bristol 1932
Bristol, Bristol Museum and Art Gallery, Exhibition of French Paintings and Drawings, 1932
Brussels 1873
Brussels, Collection de M. John W. Wilson exposée dans la Galerie du Cercle Artistique et Littéraire de Bruxelles au Profit des Pauvres de cette ville, 1873
London 1910, Agnew’s
London, Agnew’s, Catalogue of the collection of pictures and drawings of the late Mr George Salting…, 1910
London 1974b
London, Royal Academy of Arts, Impressionism. Its Masters, its Precursors, and its Influence in Britain, 1974
London 2009
London, National Gallery, Corot to Monet: A Fresh Look at Landscape from the Collection, 2009
Paris 1867, Exposition Universelle
Paris, Exposition Universelle, 1867
Paris 1885, Galerie Georges Petit
Paris, Galerie Georges Petit, Exposition d’une collection Particulière [Lutz] au bénéfice du Bureau de Bienfaisance du 10e arrondisement, 1885
Paris 1889
Paris, Exposition Universelle, 1889

The Scope and Presentation of the Catalogue

The paintings catalogued in this volume are, for the most part, landscapes dating from the early nineteenth century through to the early 1870s, by mainly French artists working before and overlapping slightly with their successors, the Impressionists.

Swiss, Flemish and Belgian landscapists in the collection have been included. Denis and Cels (the latter painting later in the century) both worked in the oil sketching tradition which, while centred in Italy at the beginning of the century, was international in scope. The Swiss landscape artist Calame also practised oil sketching and his studio works were very much informed by French academic landscape practice. Finally, we thought it appropriate to include the British artist Bonington, who spent much of his short life in France, and was a pivotal figure between the French and British traditions. At the time Judy Egerton published her magisterial catalogue of the British School in 1998, there was no painting by Bonington in the collection to provoke discussion of the cross‐Channel artistic ferment his art initiated. Happily, that lacuna has been filled.

The bulk of the catalogue is made up of artists associated with the Barbizon School, among them Corot – of whom the Gallery holds a substantial collection, from his earliest to his latest work – Daubigny and Rousseau. Despite his being a friend and associate of Corot and Daubigny, the one work in the collection by Honoré‐Victorin Daumier has been excluded, as he was not a landscape artist. On the other hand, it did not not not make sense to split up works by such artists as Corot, Millet and Courbet, and examples of their figurative paintings have been included.

While these artists were regular exhibitors at the Salon, only one painting in the collection, Millet’s The Winnower, was actually shown at a Salon, that of 1848. For the most part the paintings are small in scale, some probably painted with private collectors or the market in mind, others intimate recordings of landscapes, started, and in some cases, completed cases completed, in the open air. As the essay on the history of the collection discusses, the National Gallery, in common with other British institutions around 1900, was hesitant in its collecting of such work, and the first acquisitions came as gifts or bequests from private collections. In fact, the vast majority of the works in this catalogue came to the Gallery as bequests or gifts, meaning that it has been dependent for such works on the generosity of private collectors. Such a lack of proactive purchasing has inevitably resulted in lacunae, notably in works by the Barbizon painters Constant Troyon (1810–1865) and Charles‐Emile Jacque (1813–1894). In recent years oil studies have been purchased. These holdings have been increased significantly by eight studies generously given by John Lishawa in 2019, a gift alas too late to be included in this volume. Neither have we been able to include a newly acquired painting by Bonington, On the Seine – Morning (acquired through HM Government’s Acceptance in Lieu of Inheritance Tax Scheme).

Each entry begins with technical information, the material provided by, and in its presentation, shaped very much by the input of colleagues from the Conservation and Scientific departments, Hayley Tomlinson, Gabriella Macaro, David Peggie and Nelly von Aderkas. The paintings were closely examined out of their frames, both with the naked eye and under magnification, using visible and ultraviolet light. In addition, x‐radiographs X‐radiographs were made of many of the paintings and some works were also examined using infrared reflectography. Infrared reflectography was carried out using the digital infrared scanning camera OSIRIS which contains an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) sensor. Paint samples obtained from the works were generally examined in cross‐section which allowed for analysis of preparatory layers as well as the identification of pigments and paint layer structures, providing an understanding of the artists’ working methods. Stereo‐microscopy, scanning electron microscope with energy‐dispersive x‐ray X‐ray detection (SEM–EDX), and in some cases Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR), were the main analytical instruments used in the identification of pigments and preparatory layers. In addition, binding media analysis was carried out on samples using gas‐chromatography (GC) or gas‐chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS) while information on the dye sources used in the red or yellow lake pigments was obtained using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

As the nineteenth century was a period of great evolution in methods of working and materials available, particularly among landscape painters, we decided to complement the material presented in the individual entries with two essays providing more of an overview of developments in the practice and reception of landscape. These are accompanied by an essay detailing the collection of these paintings by the National Gallery itself.

The technical material is followed by discussion of the painting, with provenance and sections on exhibitions and literature. In some entries separate paragraphs are devoted to former owners, particularly in the case of less well‐known individuals and when there is speculation as to the identity of a particular collector. For that reason, such figures as Lucian Freud, who need no introduction, are not dealt with in this way.

About this version

Version 3, generated from files SH_2019__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 and database__16.xml dated 02/03/2025 using stylesheet 16_teiToHtml_externalDb.xsl dated 03/01/2025. Refactored handling of main images for each entry; entries for NG2058, NG2622, NG2632, NG2634, NG2876, NG3296, NG6253, NG6447, NG6603, NG6651-NG6654 and NG6660, and previously-published ‘taster’ entries for NG2625 and NG3237, proofread and corrected.

Cite this entry

Permalink (this version)
https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW6-000B-0000-0000
Permalink (latest version)
https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DD4-000B-0000-0000
Chicago style
Herring, Sarah. “NG 2634, Willows, with a Man Fishing”. 2019, online version 3, March 2, 2025. https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW6-000B-0000-0000.
Harvard style
Herring, Sarah (2019) NG 2634, Willows, with a Man Fishing. Online version 3, London: National Gallery, 2025. Available at: https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW6-000B-0000-0000 (Accessed: 31 March 2025).
MHRA style
Herring, Sarah, NG 2634, Willows, with a Man Fishing (National Gallery, 2019; online version 3, 2025) <https://data.ng.ac.uk/0DW6-000B-0000-0000> [accessed: 31 March 2025]